Anhydrite Screed

This is all well and fine , is this not the old
'ive done it for years and never had a problem' senario ??
again, remember pva , it was fine to tile onto for years, but now 😉

You watch, in a year or two they will tell you that you can't use cement addy on gypsum screeds 🙂
I'm with @widler on this one, why would the adhesive manufacturers spend £1000's and goodness only knows how much time developing products specifically for these screeds, if something they already produce is perfectly suitable?
 
In theory is it not just like tiling on a plastered wall, you prime that to form a barrier between gypsum and cement? Who u uses these adhesives on walls?
 
if you reed the palace recommendations and all the other cement based addy manufacturers, what they are saying is to put a barrier between the addy and the screed so the addy sticks to the barrier not the screed.
with the gypsem based addys they are bonding with the screed not the barrier so forming a better adhesion so making the tiles more secure to the floor and in my honest opinion less likely of failing ,and less likely of you getting a call back from your clients

I understand a recent program on grand designs has had a failure where the tiler fix on anhydrite using a cement based addy
 
In theory is it not just like tiling on a plastered wall, you prime that to form a barrier between gypsum and cement? Who u uses these adhesives on walls?
Not really as you can skim onto s/c roughcoat with no problems , completely different substrates , if they were the same they would just pump multifinish onto the floor :fearscream:
 
But the whole point is that because the screed is porous the primer will key in. If thats well bonded to the surface there won't be any issue of it coming loose or failing. So it will prevent the gypsum reacting with the cement but the adhesive is still sufficiently stuck down.

I mentioned in a previous post 2 possible pitfalls of using the anhyfix, gypfix or whatever your weapon of choice is, and the users of it didn't jump up to defend it.

Crystalisation occurs when gypsum comes into contact with cement yes? My first point was that grouts are cement based and will come into contact with the adhesive...... see the possible problem?

Next, you can't afford for the addy to get wet. So never mop a floor again?

I am going by what i've been told tech-bods from several places. So i'm 100% behind the cement and primer because we know it works.... but i'd love someone to now defend the gypsum addy's and tell me i'm wrong, then maybe i'll have the confidence in selling the stuff.
 
Id like to know tilemasters stance on this, the folks who go to great lengths and money to make these addys what are really no use to no one 😉
ps, paul c we know that cement addys work with the right prep , but im playing a augumentitive barsteward with the 'we have to move with the times' tilers , those on here who bang on about what we are supposed to use and not use on different substrates , yet when one comes out which is made for the substrate its frowned upon and not needed?
As for the grout problem im sure the scientists who make this stuff have thought of that , tested it and deemed it ok, or maybe not 😉
 
Not really as you can skim onto s/c roughcoat with no problems , completely different substrates , if they were the same they would just pump multifinish onto the floor :fearscream:

Why is it ok to skim sand and cement rendered walls then? there is no barrier between the cement and gypsum, ever tried chopping it off it's as hard as a mad mans
 
But the whole point is that because the screed is porous the primer will key in. If thats well bonded to the surface there won't be any issue of it coming loose or failing. So it will prevent the gypsum reacting with the cement but the adhesive is still sufficiently stuck down.

I mentioned in a previous post 2 possible pitfalls of using the anhyfix, gypfix or whatever your weapon of choice is, and the users of it didn't jump up to defend it.

Crystalisation occurs when gypsum comes into contact with cement yes? My first point was that grouts are cement based and will come into contact with the adhesive...... see the possible problem?

Next, you can't afford for the addy to get wet. So never mop a floor again?

I am going by what i've been told tech-bods from several places. So i'm 100% behind the cement and primer because we know it works.... but i'd love someone to now defend the gypsum addy's and tell me i'm wrong, then maybe i'll have the confidence in selling the stuff.

are the tech bods from companies that don't do an anhydrite addy caus there bound to back there products asfor not been able to mop a floor what a load of tosh most floors dry due to evaporation especially with ufh
all the floors ive sceen that have failed have all been due to cement based adhesives.and the builders /tilers not knowing what there laying on. most see a flat floor and think this is gona be easy.
the problem with these floors there a back ward step as the drying times are so long just persuaded a builder to switch to a semi dry screed as his clients want to be in for end November told him that a 65mm anny screed wouldn't be ready till January at the earliest
I actually don't give a monkeys how people tile these floors all im saying is if it pops then the problem is yours and can be expensive
 
are the tech bods from companies that don't do an anhydrite addy caus there bound to back there products asfor not been able to mop a floor what a load of tosh most floors dry due to evaporation especially with ufh
all the floors ive sceen that have failed have all been due to cement based adhesives.and the builders /tilers not knowing what there laying on. most see a flat floor and think this is gona be easy.
the problem with these floors there a back ward step as the drying times are so long just persuaded a builder to switch to a semi dry screed as his clients want to be in for end November told him that a 65mm anny screed wouldn't be ready till January at the earliest
I actually don't give a monkeys how people tile these floors all im saying is if it pops then the problem is yours and can be expensive

It's the second part of that statement that's the problem. I've heard of floors failing where a gypsum based adhesive was used but the floor hadn't been sanded or primed. If the prep is done right then there is no risk in my opinion. A mate of mine is subbing for a company and is now ripping up the 4th failed floor they've had, all done by different tilers. . Complete lack of knowledge on both sides has been costly for them
 
I was picking up some adhesive this morning and I overhead the end of a conversation where the tiles have popped up. Floor hadn't been sanded and cement based adhesive had been used. Gonna be costly for somebody
 
................. A mate of mine is subbing for a company and is now ripping up the 4th failed floor they've had, all done by different tilers. . Complete lack of knowledge on both sides has been costly for them

So that would suggest that the removal or sanding off of the laitence and priming are essential with the idea the primer forms a barrier between the adhesive and the screed

This thread could go on and on like the Sigma / Rubi debate lol.
 
Just putting the discussion of adhesive and primer aside for a moment. Does anyone know if the latency can be scraped of the day after the floor is poured. A builder I have a lot of respect for told me this is so, but every time I've fixed on one I've had to sand it.
Are the screeding companies not giving this information or is it just a case of f..k it let the tiler do it.
 
Just putting the discussion of adhesive and primer aside for a moment. Does anyone know if the latency can be scraped of the day after the floor is poured. A builder I have a lot of respect for told me this is so, but every time I've fixed on one I've had to sand it.
Are the screeding companies not giving this information or is it just a case of f..k it let the tiler do it.

I'd be interested to know the answer to this - it may be possible, as I am on my second of four new builds, I went over to the fourth plot yesterday where the flow screed had been poured only a week ago. It looked wet, it wasn't obviously but I scraped a bit with my right foot and the laitence did actually come off.

On the other two plots that I have tiled, I would say 70% of it had actually wore off with all the other trades walking all over it, so I got down on my hands and knees, used a very sharp scraper and it all came off very easily indeed - so didn't need to sand it.
 
Just putting the discussion of adhesive and primer aside for a moment. Does anyone know if the latency can be scraped of the day after the floor is poured. A builder I have a lot of respect for told me this is so, but every time I've fixed on one I've had to sand it.
Are the screeding companies not giving this information or is it just a case of f..k it let the tiler do it.
that's when its easiest to remove as ifs still soft and not baked to the floor done several floors like this when ive known from the builder when the floors going to be layed. the advantage of doing it early no dust.
 
Depends stevie, its been seen and priced, priced it using the correct adhesive as the customer had read and been told of people to use gypsum adhesive :kissingheart:
Or so i heard
 
Well after all this 'banter' the jobs off now, customer wouldn't wait even though offered to work a weekend so he could get his kitchen in by end of November..no pleasing some people!!
 

Advertisement

Thread Information

Title
Anhydrite Screed
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Australia Tiling Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
62

Advertisement

Tilers Forums Official Sponsors

UK Tiling Forum; UK

Thread statistics

Created
Spare Tool,
Last reply from
Spare Tool,
Replies
62
Views
17,881

Thread statistics

Created
Spare Tool,
Last reply from
Spare Tool,
Replies
62
Views
17,881
Back