M
Millington Deco
Hi, Guys I've just finished a kitchen splashback and used some rapid set adhesive on new gypsum plaster but forgot to prime first. Will this definitely fail and if so how long before this will happen?
I've seen tiles on a gypsum plaster no primer and they remained for many years, yes they should have been primed though...
I prime because of the high suction from plaster, the cement based adhesive losses the moisture to quick to allow it to cure probably.
Was informed from a bod from Mapei that ettringite is formed when moisture/damp is present.
I think suction is the be all
In a laymans term you are stopping the substrate from being so pourus by priming
Plaster,no primer,suck then pop de bonded
If it was a case of crystals then surely if you primed bonding plaster which is probably one of the most pourus substrates then you could tile it!
Me personally I would never tile bonding plaster if it had umpteen coats of primer
Agreed bonding plaster will wick away moisture at a rate of knots but is only an undercoat plaster so doesn't have the inherent strength to support tiles regardless of priming or not. No addy manufacturer would guarantee their products straight onto bonding. Like I said earlier, I'm certainly no chemist just expressing an opinion. Personally I live by the prime everything rule.
Ok, a plasterer puts a finish on dry bonding that suck moisture out so the top coat is worthless, you can prime till the cows come home and it would'nt make a blind bit of difference.
Completely agree in that scenario priming would be pointless but I don't really get the argument sorry. No plasterer would apply a finish coat to dry bonding. They either do it same day or they prime. If however a plasterer was to do this, the finish coat would be so full of hairline cracks and hollow sounding that no tiler would consider it a suitable surface to tile on regardless of priming or not.