O
Would have been nice if they’d published weteoom regs too.
Just out of interest marc what joint size do you use and what gap between mitres .
Yes . Bal board been out how long when Marmox. Wedi .orbry and Jacko. Hardi.nmp to name just a few have been out for yearsBAL board advert anyway.
Very thinly disguised.
I like Dave Wilson, heck I even like BAL - but funny how market forces drive British Standards isn't it?
Or is it my cynical imagination
BAL board advert anyway.
Very thinly disguised.
I like Dave Wilson, heck I even like BAL - but funny how market forces drive British Standards isn't it?
Or is it my cynical imagination
Yes . Bal board been out how long when Marmox. Wedi .orbry and Jacko. Hardi.nmp to name just a few have been out for years
It'll probably win innovative product of the year 2019 I’m sure! 😀
Would have saved me an argument or two at that Esher job with all the niches recently. 😛Ah well, Ply is rubbish anyway.
You should have had a green mdf wet tray like I had this year.Would have saved me an argument or two at that Esher job with all the niches recently. 😛
Not been that lucky, but I did have 10 ply niches all in the same house in Esher.You should have had a green mdf wet tray like I had this year.
"but it's water proof mdf..."
😵
What did you do? Over board, replace or tank?Not been that lucky, but I did have 10 ply niches all in the same house in Esher.
And when I asked why they were built with ply, the best he could come up with was, well cos we always do it that way!
Well......... That’s ok then eh!!!!!
They were all overboarded with 4mm wedi and mechanically fixed.What did you do? Over board, replace or tank?
My thoughts exactlyBAL board advert anyway.
Very thinly disguised.
I like Dave Wilson, heck I even like BAL - but funny how market forces drive British Standards isn't it?
Or is it my cynical imagination
Just irritates me that it's so dressed up.My thoughts exactly
Did you see the tweet about the adhesive failures and the TTA independent tests Mark?Just irritates me that it's so dressed up.
Like a cheap advertorial on the daily mail!
No! Do tell...Did you see the tweet about the adhesive failures and the TTA independent tests Mark?
TTA TESTS AGAINST NON-CONFORMING PRODUCTS - ******** - http://www.********.co.uk/tta-tests-non-conforming-products/
Why are they not obliged to state which adhesive isn't meeting standards they advertise!?TTA TESTS AGAINST NON-CONFORMING PRODUCTS - ******** - http://www.********.co.uk/tta-tests-non-conforming-products/
Why are they not obliged to state which adhesive isn't meeting standards they advertise!?
Well it makes you wonder where they stand in the eyes of the law tbh H!Why are they not obliged to state which adhesive isn't meeting standards they advertise!?
Well it makes you wonder where they stand in the eyes of the law tbh H!
If for instance one of us was to lay a £50k floor 😉
And it was a catastrophic failure, and the adhesive used was the unmentioned one in the article, where would the tta stand?
Cos the adhesive company has not been named, you would go back to them and in true adhesive company style, they’d blame us, unless we could prove different. However as the tta have that information and they haven’t divulged it, does that make them guilty of conspiracy to defraud? I think they’d be on dodgy ground tbh. But what do I know? 🙄
They probably cant say because as you say the adhesive company are disputing this and are blaming the test laboratory claiming the reason its failed is because they have taken it out of the packet and used it .Well it makes you wonder where they stand in the eyes of the law tbh H!
If for instance one of us was to lay a £50k floor 😉
And it was a catastrophic failure, and the adhesive used was the unmentioned one in the article, where would the tta stand?
Cos the adhesive company has not been named, you would go back to them and in true adhesive company style, they’d blame us, unless we could prove different. However as the tta have that information and they haven’t divulged it, does that make them guilty of conspiracy to defraud? I think they’d be on dodgy ground tbh. But what do I know? 🙄
Well it makes you wonder where they stand in the eyes of the law tbh H!
If for instance one of us was to lay a £50k floor 😉
And it was a catastrophic failure, and the adhesive used was the unmentioned one in the article, where would the tta stand?
Cos the adhesive company has not been named, you would go back to them and in true adhesive company style, they’d blame us, unless we could prove different. However as the tta have that information and they haven’t divulged it, does that make them guilty of conspiracy to defraud? I think they’d be on dodgy ground tbh. But what do I know? 🙄