Say No To Burying Nuclear Waste in the Lake District - Tile Advice

[DHTiling]

Goverment wants to build a nuclear waste repository under the Lake District. The Lake District National Park is no place for nuclear waste! We all need to say NO

​

The Nightmare Plan - NoLakesNukeDump

Sign the petition here>>> No Nuclear Dump in the Lake District | Campaigns by You

 

[DHTiling]

75% of the lakes will be affected.

 

[Dan]

Not good! What the hell are they thinking?!?!

That's like saying an airport should be the place we hold Islamic extremists.

 

[Dan]

Signed.

 

[Diamond Pool Finishers]

Well i expect it's got to go somewhere ! ,and thats a long way from the midlands /south !, where the main population is !, OK GUYS if it has to go somewhere where ? would you put it' ?

 

[widler]

Well i expect it's got to go somewhere ! ,and thats a long way from the midlands /south !, where the main population is !, OK GUYS if it has to go somewhere where ? would you put it' ?

Midland, south of england would be my 1st choice

 

[Andy Allen]

or burnley.......:smilewinkgrin:

 

[dave l and l]

well its got to go somewhere. already doing it up in dounreay,

 

[Ajax123]

What I can never understand is wh this sort of waste is not burried in uprise made pits near to the source. These areas are already contaminated so it would presumably have less impact on the local areas that way.

 

[enduro]

Isle of Sheppy.

 

[DHTiling]

Stick it in wales , full of wooley heads anyway :lol:

 

[widler]

Yup, as long as its under where all the scroats , bagheads and dealers are, ive no problem at all with that

 

[Dan]

As Al said, I'd keep the waste near the source. It would have already been approved for handling such materials and therefore makes sense to keep it there. They'd perhaps think more about how much is being produced if they had to manage the storage of it long-term rather than just pay a firm to sort it out and see it as a minor regular cost.